Talk:Justification (theology)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Justification (theology) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Justification (theology) was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 3, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

Christianity: Theology / Catholicism / Eastern O. / Lutheranism / Reformed Christianity / Arminianism / Methodism / Evangelical Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Lutheranism (assessed as Top-importance).
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Arminianism (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Methodism work group (assessed as High-importance).
	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Evangelical Christianity (assessed as Top-importance).

Religion Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

2007 Comments

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Justification (theology). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060909100829/http://www.ctsfw.edu/library/files/pb/1458 to http://www.ctsfw.edu/library/files/pb/1458

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Matthias Reimer?

Information has been added based on a book whose author is Matthias Reimer, could someone tell me who he is? Rafaelosornio (talk) 15:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit suspicious. It seems like a possible COI as well as undue weight. This is a published dissertation. Reimer is certainly not a notable scholar. St Anselm (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joint Declaration on Justification

This century, the story on Justification has changed quite dramatically as more communions have affirmed the Lutheran-Catholic Joint Declaration. I have re-jigged the lead to reflect this. Indeed, it may be that whole article needs to be revised so that instead of concentrating on the differences, it treats the consensus. It may be that the differences will progressively become of historical rather than theological interest.

That being said, certainly not all denominations have agreed to the Joint Declaration, and there are certainly individuals within all groups who disagree with the contents of the Joint Declaration, or that think that it wallpapers over important things (such as predestination), or insist that their opponents affirming it cannot be affirming it, or point out that the bodies signing may have limited authority (e.g. for the Catholics, that it would take a definite Council statement ratified by a Pope.)

Editorial considerations

Furthermore, the Joint Declaration poses an interesting challenge for Wikipedia editors, because almost all academic sources on theology and religious history have presented Catholic-versus-Protestant views as sharp dichotomies, whereas the Joint Declaration casts them in terms of obsolete anathemas against extreme positions almost no-one actually holds. I think it means that discussion in terms of slogans "Sola fide" etc needs to be severely tempered and situated in a historical context. For example, I have adjusted/softened to the lead to say that Catholics "portray" infusion and Protestants "portray" imputation, because it is simply not the case that Catholics blankly deny imputation (see John Henry Newman on justification for more on this, noting that the Catholic theological tendency is omniverous ("et et") rather than puritan.

The Joint Declaration, from what I can read, does challenge what many Catholics and Protestants have been taught to believe are their total differences, and certainly makes redundant many of the sectarian assertions bandied about at and after the Reformation. Of course, Wikipedia cannot make sides about which theology is true and correct, however, we editors may need to recognize that, in many historical sources, the basis of much partisan characterization of different church's theology on Justification is now sans culottes. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 04:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]